<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Architecture jocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/</link>
	<description>contemporary metamorphoses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:37:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adaptivereuse.net &#187; Ark</title>
		<link>http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/#comment-40903</link>
		<dc:creator>adaptivereuse.net &#187; Ark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/#comment-40903</guid>
		<description>[...] Lin came to mind when we were writing about Herzog &amp; de Meuron&#8217;s levitating Caixa Forum building because she also had built a levitating building, the adaptively reused cantilever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lin came to mind when we were writing about Herzog &amp; de Meuron&#8217;s levitating Caixa Forum building because she also had built a levitating building, the adaptively reused cantilever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/#comment-40195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/#comment-40195</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve pricked my conscience so I&#039;ve changed the post to afflict the other wrong doers as well. In fact in the end it&#039;s all down to money poisoning everything. We&#039;ve had a particularly monstrous example of this here today where the state government has just abolished its heritage office after a slimy and dishonest campaign in the corporate media against heritage legislation - more proof that there is only one unforgivable crime left in our society, &quot;Thou shalt not stop a company from making money by any means whatsoever.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve pricked my conscience so I&#8217;ve changed the post to afflict the other wrong doers as well. In fact in the end it&#8217;s all down to money poisoning everything. We&#8217;ve had a particularly monstrous example of this here today where the state government has just abolished its heritage office after a slimy and dishonest campaign in the corporate media against heritage legislation &#8211; more proof that there is only one unforgivable crime left in our society, &#8220;Thou shalt not stop a company from making money by any means whatsoever.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bottleman</title>
		<link>http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/#comment-40171</link>
		<dc:creator>bottleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adaptivereuse.net/2008/02/13/architecture-jocks/#comment-40171</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been revolted (or, mostly, confused) by facadism too, but let me just chime in with one thing.  At least in my area, it&#039;s not the mediocre architects that are the problem, it&#039;s the mediocre developers and the mediocre civic authorities who conceive it as a meaningful solution.  They make the basic decision &quot;we&#039;re going to make building X in this spot, and oh yes leave a little bit of the previous structure to show how sensitive we are.&quot;  It&#039;s become a convention applied everywhere in town, even to this lame 1970s grocery that is being razed for the sake of a huge condo building.  This kind of thing might even be written into planning standards or required to get permits.  You wouldn&#039;t believe how hidebound things are.  So I wouldn&#039;t blame architects for the concept -- just for the execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been revolted (or, mostly, confused) by facadism too, but let me just chime in with one thing.  At least in my area, it&#8217;s not the mediocre architects that are the problem, it&#8217;s the mediocre developers and the mediocre civic authorities who conceive it as a meaningful solution.  They make the basic decision &#8220;we&#8217;re going to make building X in this spot, and oh yes leave a little bit of the previous structure to show how sensitive we are.&#8221;  It&#8217;s become a convention applied everywhere in town, even to this lame 1970s grocery that is being razed for the sake of a huge condo building.  This kind of thing might even be written into planning standards or required to get permits.  You wouldn&#8217;t believe how hidebound things are.  So I wouldn&#8217;t blame architects for the concept &#8212; just for the execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

